[Bug 192251] New: Several section 9 manpages incorrectly reference evh not evhand when describing struct moduledata_t
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Tue Jul 29 19:53:14 UTC 2014
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192251
Bug ID: 192251
Summary: Several section 9 manpages incorrectly reference evh
not evhand when describing struct moduledata_t
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: Needs Triage
Severity: Affects Some People
Priority: ---
Component: Documentation
Assignee: freebsd-doc at FreeBSD.org
Reporter: yaneurabeya at gmail.com
A number of manpages reference the evh member of moduledata_t, but the field in
the structure has been evhand since its initial introduction in r25537 (see
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/sys/module.h?view=markup&pathrev=25537
). The references should be fixed to state evhand so that the structure could
be initialized in a C99+ way with the right parameters.
$ grep -r evh /usr/src/share/man/ | sed -e 's,/usr/src/share/man/,,'
man9/DEV_MODULE.9:.Fn DEV_MODULE "name" "modeventhand_t evh" "void *arg"
man9/DEV_MODULE.9:.Fa evh
man9/DRIVER_MODULE.9:.Fn DRIVER_MODULE name busname "driver_t driver"
"devclass_t devclass" "modeventhand_t evh" "void *arg"
man9/DRIVER_MODULE.9:.Fn DRIVER_MODULE_ORDERED name busname "driver_t driver"
"devclass_t devclass" "modeventhand_t evh" "void *arg" "int order"
man9/DRIVER_MODULE.9:.Fn EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE name busname "driver_t driver"
"devclass_t devclass" "modeventhand_t evh" "void *arg" "enum sysinit_elem_order
order" "int pass"
man9/DRIVER_MODULE.9:.Fn EARLY_DRIVER_MODULE_ORDERED name busname "driver_t
driver" "devclass_t devclass" "modeventhand_t evh" "void *arg" "enum
sysinit_elem_order order" "int pass"
man9/DRIVER_MODULE.9:.Fa evh
man9/SYSCALL_MODULE.9:.Fn SYSCALL_MODULE name "int *offset" "struct sysent
*new_sysent" "modeventhand_t evh" "void *arg"
man9/SYSCALL_MODULE.9:.It Fa evh
man9/SYSCALL_MODULE.9:.Fa evh
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-doc
mailing list