What are the limits for FFS file systems? 10+ years out of date..

[Eitan Adler]

On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 1:12 AM, John-Mark Gurney <jmg at funkthat.com> wrote:
> Attached is a patch that bring this up to date..  This was written back
> when we were using UFS1 w/ 32bit block addresses...  Things have changes
> now that UFS2 is standard...
>
> The big thing is listing the memory requirements for fsck as the main
> limiting factor on FS size...
>
> I've had Kirk review the patch, and he's fine w/ it...
>
> Shall I just commit it?

 i&nbps;386 -> &i386; After that, it is okay to commit.



-- 
Eitan Adler