docs/176648: restore(8) man page is misleading/confusing
Ronald F.Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Mon Mar 4 20:00:02 UTC 2013
>Number: 176648
>Category: docs
>Synopsis: restore(8) man page is misleading/confusing
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-doc
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: doc-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Mon Mar 04 20:00:01 UTC 2013
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Ronald F. Guilmette
>Release: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE amd64
>Organization:
entr0py
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE amd64
>Description:
The following text appears in the restore(8) man page:
The -r flag ... can be detrimental to one's health if
not used carefully (not to mention the disk). An example:
newfs /dev/da0s1a
mount /dev/da0s1a /mnt
cd /mnt
restore rf /dev/sa0
The above passage is confusing because first it is giving an omnious
warning about bad effects that can derive from misusing the -r option,
and then, immediately following that, it gives an example of _correct_
usage of the -r option.
It has been suggested that the material begining with "An example:" should
be placed into its own separate paragraph, and I agree with that suggestion.
Furthermore, I think that it would be best to make the meaning entirely
clear by changing "An example:" to "Here is an example of how to
_correctly_ use the -r option:"
>How-To-Repeat:
man 8 restore
>Fix:
See above.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
More information about the freebsd-doc
mailing list