Another CSS suggestion: pre-wrap

[Glen Barber]

On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:32:12PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> On 2013.07.28. 22:23, Glen Barber wrote:
> >On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:17:50PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> >>>I believe it is possible to make them work together. But using these
> >>>extensions requires using Saxon as the XSLT processor, which is
> >>>Java-based and slower than xsltproc. Even if we end up using Java
> >>>for PDF rendering, it would be better to keep the XHTML build fast
> >>>and Java-free so that committers can easily test their work.
> >>>
> >Yes, please, let's keep it Java-free...
> >
> >IMHO, it is bad enough some of use require use of Java for basic web
> >browsing.  Adding that to a our doc build is a big red bug.
> What do you mean for basic web browsing? Where is Java required for that?
> 

Unfortunately some regular sites I have to visit.

My real point is that making Java part of our regular doc build, IMHO,
is a regression.

Glen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/attachments/20130728/6de89b2d/attachment.sig>