Conversion to SVN

[Marc Fonvieille]

On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 09:37:05AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 10/09/2011 08:33, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:57:59PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> >> On 2011.10.08. 11:03, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> >>> And before doing the change, some things should
> >>> be done: complete separation between release docs and doc/
> >> Or maybe complete integration? Once we are in SVN we can branch release 
> >> docs even if we do not branch the rest to make it easy for translators. 
> >> What do you think?
> >>
> > 
> > It's obvious that your point of view can also be defended, but the aim
> > from src point of view is to be able to build a release without the need
> > of a doc tree.
> 
> If there isn't already a knob to avoid building the docs in the new
> release building system (like there was in the old one) then there
> certainly should be.
>

By "release" I meant "release bits + its release docs".

> Meanwhile, one of the virtues of having doc and src in the same svn repo
> is the ability to have one canonical version of the documentation.
>


-- 
Marc