cvs commit: doc/fr_FR.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/multimedia chapter.sgml doc/fr_FR.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mirrors chapter.sgml

[Gabor PALI]

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Remko Lodder <remko at elvandar.org> wrote:

> Yes, it does make sense to keep them in CVS, because it takes a hell lot
> more time to get them translated again then to update the various pieces.
>

I think I know this very well.


Note that I the things that you are suggestion are striking me as one of the
> translation teams. We (doc-nl) will decide for ourself whether or not we
> update documentation and whether or not we will be keeping 'stale' documents
> around.
>

Obviously.  I am just curious, because I do not see too much sense to keep
outdated translations in the tree.


:g