docs/124016: articles/problem-reports: The word "in" is missing between "seen" and "HTML".

[Sahil Tandon]

>Number:         124016
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       articles/problem-reports: The word "in" is missing between "seen" and "HTML".
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-doc
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Mon May 26 23:10:00 UTC 2008
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Sahil Tandon
>Release:        FreeBSD 7.0
>Organization:
>Environment:
FreeBSD beast.localdomain 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Feb 24 19:59:52 UTC 2008     root at logan.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386

>Description:
In reading en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/article.html, I noticed the word "in" was missing between "seen" and "HTML".  The attached diff simply adds that word.  One cannot be sure of the exact word intended by the author, but "in" is a pretty good guess. :-)
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:
See attached diff.

Patch attached with submission follows:

--- en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/article.sgml.old	2008-05-24 19:56:36.000000000 -0400
+++ en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/article.sgml	2008-05-24 19:58:11.000000000 -0400
@@ -1207,7 +1207,7 @@
 
     <note>
       <para>Among the anti-spam measures is one that weighs against
-	many common abuses seen HTML-based email (although not necessarily
+	many common abuses seen in HTML-based email (although not necessarily
 	the mere inclusion of HTML in a PR).  We strongly recommend
 	against the use of HTML-based email when sending PRs: not
 	only is it more likely to fall afoul of the filters, it also


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: