docs/117308: Clarification of /etc/defaults/devfs.rules status
Mel
mel.xyzzy at rachie.is-a-geek.net
Thu Oct 18 18:20:03 UTC 2007
>Number: 117308
>Category: docs
>Synopsis: Clarification of /etc/defaults/devfs.rules status
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: freebsd-doc
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: doc-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Thu Oct 18 18:20:02 UTC 2007
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Mel
>Release: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE i386
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Mon Mar 26 09:16:30 AKDT 2007 root at smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
>Description:
After reading devfs(8), rc.conf(5) and devfs.rules(5) and some scanning of
/etc/rc.d/* it's still unclear what the status of /etc/defaults/devfs.rules
is, once one creates /etc/devfs.rules.
Meaning: are they merged and are same-name or same-number overridden by
/etc/devfs.rules or is /etc/defaults/devfs.rules complete ignored if an
/etc/devfs.rules is detected. Or is /etc/defaults/devfs.rules always loaded
and should the sysadmin avoid name/number clashes?
>How-To-Repeat:
N.A.
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
More information about the freebsd-doc
mailing list