make buildkernel fails without complete source tree

[Ruslan Ermilov]

On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 02:01:38PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> True.  I guess this is sort of where I was headed.  IMHO we should
> either leave it as-is for the traditionalists or we should bite the
> bullet and stop providing a separate kernel source tree.  As John
> pointed out in the message after this one life has moved on and
> now /usr/src is teeny compared to the size of disks.  Is it worth the
> hassle/confusion to provide just kernel source any more?
> 
Thinking of embedded world, it still makes a lot of sense.
I think adding a note to Handbook would be a good solution.


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov
ru at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/attachments/20070122/f47c6819/attachment-0001.sig>