docs/99336: Unclear handbook wording
Giorgos Keramidas
keramida at freebsd.org
Fri Jun 23 12:50:22 UTC 2006
The following reply was made to PR docs/99336; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida at freebsd.org>
To: Merijn Verstraaten <merijn.verstraaten at xs4all.nl>
Cc: bug-followup at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: docs/99336: Unclear handbook wording
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:41:16 +0300
On 2006-06-23 00:16, Merijn Verstraaten <merijn.verstraaten at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> Firewall chapter, IPFW configuration (26.6)
>
> "If you do not have IPFW compiled into your kernel you will need to
> load it with the following statement in your /etc/rc.conf:
>
> firewall_enable="YES""
>
> It's not clear that while IPFW will start fine without
> firewall_enable="YES" in rc.conf if you have it compiled into your
> kernel, the rules script provided with firewall_script won't run if
> firewall_enable="YES" isn't set.
Hmmm, well the text is unclear. It doesn't matter if you compile `IPFW'
support into your kernel or not these days. The /etc/rc.d/ipfw script
will take care of loading the module automatically.
Even `DUMMYNET' can be loaded as a module in FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT now.
Can someone from the freebsd-doc people who has access to a STABLE
system check if auto-loading of ipfw.ko and dummynet.ko modules works as
expected in FreeBSD 6.X too? Then we should remove this confusing part
about ``having IPFW compiled into your kernel''.
- Giorgos
More information about the freebsd-doc
mailing list