docs/93014: minor nits in the project model book (dev-model)
Ben Kaduk
minimarmot at gmail.com
Fri Feb 10 16:16:40 UTC 2006
On 2/10/06, Daniel Gerzo <danger at rulez.sk> wrote:
>
> Halo Giorgos,
>
> Friday, February 10, 2006, 4:30:14 PM, si tukal:
>
> > The following reply was made to PR docs/93014; it has been noted by
> GNATS.
>
> > From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida at freebsd.org>
> > To: Ben Kaduk <minimarmot at gmail.com>
> > Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit at freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: docs/93014: minor nits in the project model book
> (dev-model)
> > Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:23:52 +0200
>
> > On 2006-02-08 03:56, Ben Kaduk <minimarmot at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> In the project model book, I found a few minor nits whilst perusing
> >> its contents.
> >>
> >> One nit is the use of "to" instead of "too" on line 2209 of the source.
> >
> >> >Fix:
> >> --- book.sgml Wed Feb 8 02:38:24 2006
> >> +++ book.sgml.orig Wed Feb 8 02:38:08 2006
> >> @@ -2206,7 +2206,7 @@
> >> stability cannot be sacrificed by self-imposed
> deadlines and
> >> target release dates.
> >>
> >> - For slips of time not to become too long with
> regards to security
> >> + For slips of time not to become to long with
> regards to security
> >> and stability issues,
> >> extra discipline is required when committing
> changes to -STABLE.
> >
> > Hmmm, not really. The original text is ok. "too long" refers to the
> > length of a time period. I'm not sure what "to long" would mean here.
> >
>
> looks okay to me too.
I guess I should apologize -- I made this diff hastily, and put the
arguments in the wrong order -- the original text has "to long,"
I am proposing to change it to "too long". Unless I'm misunderstanding you,
here.
Ben Kaduk
--
> Cheers,
> Daniel Gerzo
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-doc at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
More information about the freebsd-doc
mailing list