[patch] XML'ified version of release todo list
Daniel Gerzo
danger at rulez.sk
Sun Feb 5 18:38:41 UTC 2006
Hi Hiroki,
Sunday, February 5, 2006, 5:33:06 PM, you answered:
> Daniel Gerzo <danger at rulez.sk> wrote
> in <2410146308.20060205115220 at rulez.sk>:
da>> Sunday, February 5, 2006, 12:30:02 AM, you wrote:
da>> > advantages to switching our process to XML here?
da>>
da>> It should be a lot easier for people editing the todo list to
da>> change for example the class from showstopper to testing, simply by
da>> editing the class="" attribute in <entry> element in todo.xml and
da>> the xsl template will take over other work for you. You don't need
da>> to move a long part of html code down to the other section. Also,
da>> it is possible to sort the list (it's sorted by Issue name now)
> Well, I agree that XML is useful but I believe this sort of simple
> .html-->.xml conversion has few advantages because .html is
you probably meant disadvantages (otherwise it doesn't make sence for
me)
> simpler than .xml + .xsl + .dtd and many developers are familiar
> with HTML.
yeah, I agree here, but developers editing the todo list don't have
to bother about .xsl and .dtd, they just need to work with todo.xml
which is basically very simple.
> So if we do so, I think we need to make clear the benefits.
> I personally think simplification and/or improving reusability
> can become an advantage, but since whether it makes editing easier
> or not depends on who edits it and how frequently it will be edited,
> it is not persuasive very much.
well, the frequency depends on release periods in which these files
will be edited, and since we switched in time-based releases this is
even more clear how often it will be edited.
Actually, why to have doubts about this if it is already done? :-)
> --
> | Hiroki SATO
--
Sincerely
Daniel Gerzo
More information about the freebsd-doc
mailing list