docs/67893: [patch] boot(8)'s -m description is insufficient.

[Doug Barton]

Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, 23:44+0200, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
> 
>> Hello Doug,
>>
>> Tuesday, April 18, 2006, 11:40:31 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>> My understanding is that when something is committed to HEAD, the
>>> state of the PR should be changed to patched, and then closed when
>>> the fix is MFC'ed, is that no longer the case, or is my
>>> understanding wrong?
>> I would say, that it's still the way you wrote, but I noticed that
>> not all commiters follow this rule :/
>>
>> (FYI i'm not commiter, so I might be wrong, although I recall reading
>> that somewhere, possibly on /internal/ pages.)
> 
> Send a complain to core@ and they remove my commit bit from access ;-)
> 
> Actually, I don't get it as a strict rule.  I used to use "patched"
> state as an MFC reminder for the critical from my POV PRs.  For all
> other I have different mechanism.
> 
> And trust me, I don't forget to MFC this change to RELENG_6.
> 

I'll keep that in mind for the future, thanks.

Doug

-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection