docs/76399: [PATCH] sendto(2) is missing possible error EISCONN

[Rudolf Cejka]

The following reply was made to PR docs/76399; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Rudolf Cejka <cejkar at fit.vutbr.cz>
To: bug-followup at freebsd.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: docs/76399: [PATCH] sendto(2) is missing possible error EISCONN
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:00:03 +0100

 Giorgos Keramidas wrote (2005/01/19):
 > A connection is made to localhost:22 (sshd must be running for this to
 > succeed), and then sendto() is used to send a packet to a different
 > host over the same socket.
 > 
 > EISCONN was never returned in 6.0-CURRENT.  The packet is AFAICT
 > silently dropped.
 > 
 > Am I doing something wrong?
 
 Oops, I'm sorry that you had to create some testing example
 - it was possible that I could send one...
 
 Just change SOCK_STREAM to SOCK_DGRAM. However, I do not understand,
 why there is a difference between SOCK_STREAM and SOCK_DGRAM, because
 I thought from ipc_usrreq.c in /usr/src/sys, that the behavioour
 should be the same.
 
 Thank you very much.
 
 -- 
 Rudolf Cejka <cejkar at fit.vutbr.cz> http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar
 Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology
 Bozetechova 2, 612 66  Brno, Czech Republic