abandoning jade
Pav Lucistnik
pav at FreeBSD.org
Tue Aug 30 21:08:36 UTC 2005
Pav Lucistnik píše v út 30. 08. 2005 v 22:28 +0200:
> Murray Stokely píše v út 30. 08. 2005 v 12:41 -0700:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:35:16AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> > > Pav Lucistnik <pav at FreeBSD.org> wrote
> > > in <1125401964.4959.28.camel at pav.hide.vol.cz>:
> > >
> > > pa> Why we do still stick with jade, when better faster happier openjade is
> > > pa> available? If it's purely historical sentiment, isn't it time for a
> > > pa> global switch to openjade?
> > >
> > > IIRC, Murray said that OpenJade had a problem on rendering
> > > the handbook in printable format some years ago.
> > > Murray, is it correct? If so, do you remember what the problem is?
> > > If there is no longer the problem, I agree with switch to OpenJade.
> >
> > There have historically been lots of problems with OpenJade. Whoever
> > wants to make the change should verify that PDF versions of all of our
> > documents in the tree can build with OpenJade (and with/without index,
> > etc..).
> >
> > If it works, great. Just because it is on a sourceforge page doesn't
> > make it better maintained. Hardly anyone was working on it when I had
> > a commit bit to the openjade sourceforge project.
>
> Just tried to build Porter's Handbook into PDF with openjade and
> jadetex, got 11 pages of garbage. Not good, not at all.
Correction: I got 11 pages of garbage when working in my locale. When I
put LANG=C in front of make, it generates pretty nice PDF...
Here is the PH generated with openjade+jadetex on amd64:
http://raven.oook.cz/ph.pdf
Looks good to me. It generates a fair amount of warnings, I don't know
if those are normal in jade builds too?
--
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
<pav at FreeBSD.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/attachments/20050830/9ff4902c/attachment.sig>
More information about the freebsd-doc
mailing list