does this require a manpage date bump?

Sat Oct 23 23:02:21 UTC 2004

On 2004.10.24 00:05:48 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:

> Does a minor change like the following require a manpage date bump?
>
> %%%
> --- du.1.orig	2 Jul 2004 22:22:23 -0000	1.28
> +++ du.1	23 Oct 2004 21:02:35 -0000
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
>  .It Fl h
>  "Human-readable" output.
>  Use unit suffixes: Byte, Kilobyte, Megabyte,
> -Gigabyte, Terabyte and Petabyte
> +Gigabyte, Terabyte and Petabyte.
>  .It Fl r
>  Generate messages about directories that cannot be read, files
>  that cannot be opened, and so on.
> %%%

No, according to Ruslan it should only be done if there is actual
content change.  Of course it comes down to a judgment call, but in
this case I think you can safely skip the bump.  If not, Ruslan will
probably tell you post-commit :-).

-- 
Simon L. Nielsen
FreeBSD Documentation Team
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/attachments/20041024/83299eae/attachment.sig>