<section> vs. <sectN>

[Ceri Davies]

On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:52:48PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> 
> Which of these do we prefer?
> 
> 1) <section>
>      <para>foo</para>
>      <section>
>        <para>bar</para>
>      </section>
>    </section>
> 
> 2) <sect1>
>      <para>foo</para>
>      <sect2>
>        <para>bar</para>
>      </sect2>
>    </sect1>
> 
> This is basically a style issue, as DocBook does the same for both, so
> whatever the outcome it should probably be added to the FDP.
> 
> I'll note here that nearly all of our documents use #2 already; I am
> working on one of the ones that doesn't.

I sense a lack of consensus, so I won't change this particular document.
Thanks all,

Ceri
-- 
It is not tinfoil, it is my new skin.  I am a robot.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/attachments/20040730/544dac8e/attachment.sig>