<section> vs. <sectN>

[Denis Peplin]

Hello!

For me 1'st variant looks better.
For example i can skip whole sect1 on first
updating and then include it by searching /sect1
once.
With section's search will stop on each section
included (currently sect2, sect3, sect4) many times.

just my $0.02 :)

Ceri Davies wrote:
> Which of these do we prefer?
> 
> 1) <section>
>      <para>foo</para>
>      <section>
>        <para>bar</para>
>      </section>
>    </section>
> 
> 2) <sect1>
>      <para>foo</para>
>      <sect2>
>        <para>bar</para>
>      </sect2>
>    </sect1>
> 
> This is basically a style issue, as DocBook does the same for both, so
> whatever the outcome it should probably be added to the FDP.
> 
> I'll note here that nearly all of our documents use #2 already; I am
> working on one of the ones that doesn't.
> 
> Ceri