<section> vs. <sectN>

[Giorgos Keramidas]

On 2004-07-28 21:52, Ceri Davies <ceri at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
[snip about <sect1> vs. <section> in docbook sources>
>
> I'll note here that nearly all of our documents use #2 already; I am
> working on one of the ones that doesn't.

des@ has committed changes to his PR related articles that substitute
stuff like this: s/sect[1-9]/section/

See, for instace, rev. 1.22 of
doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/article.sgml

I'm not sure if it was a matter of personal taste or if he had something
else in mind.  I'd like to hear what he has to say too before deciding
for or against some style rule.