docs/61585: small typo in arch-handbook ("posh" instruction)
Rostislav Krasny
rosti_bsd at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 19 17:10:10 UTC 2004
>Number: 61585
>Category: docs
>Synopsis: small typo in arch-handbook ("posh" instruction)
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-doc
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: doc-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Mon Jan 19 09:10:07 PST 2004
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Rostislav Krasny
>Release: 5.2-RELEASE
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
"Sergey 'DoubleF' Zaharchenko" <doublef at tele-kom.ru> suggested me
send this doc PR. This is a copy of its response email:
> I thought that I found a typo in the arch-handbook and I wrote about
> that to the freebsd-doc mailing list. You can read that email at
> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040117005106.21558.qmail
> I didn't get any response yet. Maybe I'm missing something and this
> isn't a typo? What is "posh" instruction? :-))
Yes, it's pushf with fewer letters and spelled differently... Send a
doc
PR. BTW, I think I understand the phrase about `real mode instructions'
correctly, but I'd change it to `instructions which mess with the
physical interrupt flag', as I think that's more correct, as these are
not necessarily real mode instructions.
And this is my original typo report:
The "1.5 boot2 stage" section of the arch-handbook have following text:
virtual v86 mode. That means, the BTX is a v86 monitor. Real mode
instructions like posh, popf, cli, sti, if called by the client, will
work.
What is "posh" instruction? IMHO it should be changed to "pushf" one.
>How-To-Repeat:
Just read the "1.5 boot2 stage" section of arch-handbook
>Fix:
The "posh" instruction should be changed to the "pushf" one
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
More information about the freebsd-doc
mailing list