docs/40196: man find does not describe -follow
Tom Rhodes
trhodes at FreeBSD.org
Tue Feb 24 15:40:23 UTC 2004
The following reply was made to PR docs/40196; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes at FreeBSD.org>
To: des at des.no (Dag-Erling =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/40196: man find does not describe -follow
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:32:35 -0500
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 07:57:42 +0100
des at des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) wrote:
> "Peter C. Lai" <sirmoo at cowbert.2y.net> writes:
> > -follow works on the command line. Is it just another method to
> > invoke -H? I find it strange that the only mention of -follow is in
> > the STANDARDS section, since that's not the most intutitive place to
> > look for it (yes, I did read it); I guess the misspelling threw me
> > off since there's no -h option (only -H) :) Shouldn't we at least
> > put in a line for -follow saying "another name for -H"?
>=20
> It isn't "another name for -H", and the reason why is explained in the
> STANDARDS section. Please read it again.
>=20
> If you insist on documenting -follow, make sure to
>=20
> - document it in the correct section (PRIMARIES, not DESCRIPTION)
> - note that it does not behave like other primaries do
> - note that it should not be used except for compatibility reasons
> - also document -depth and -xdev in the same manner
Wouldn't a note that -follow is supported only for compatibility
reasons?
--=20
Tom Rhodes
More information about the freebsd-doc
mailing list