docs/62236: [patch] FAQ: 5-STABLE branch was not created at 5.2

[Jesus R.Camou]

	Note: There was a bad value `los' for the field `>Priority:'.
	It was set to the default value of `medium'.


>Number:         62236
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       [patch] FAQ: 5-STABLE branch was not created at 5.2
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-doc
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Feb 01 15:30:17 PST 2004
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Jesus R. Camou
>Release:        FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE i386
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD nightfall.cox.net 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #7: Thu Oct 30 09:09:53 PST 2003 sku at nightfall.cox.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NIGHTFALL i386

>Description:
5-STABLE branch not created at 5.2. It is suppose to be branched at 5.3.
Small detail that can confuse a reader who is not very familiar with the releng.

>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

Index: book.sgml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.sgml,v
retrieving revision 1.605
diff -u -r1.605 book.sgml
--- book.sgml	30 Jan 2004 17:48:55 -0000	1.605
+++ book.sgml	1 Feb 2004 23:16:45 -0000
@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@
             only well-tested bug fixes and other small incremental
             enhancements.  FreeBSD-CURRENT, on the other hand, has
             been one unbroken line since 2.0 was released, leading
-            towards 5.2-RELEASE (and beyond).  At 5.2-RELEASE, the
+            towards 5.2-RELEASE (and beyond).  At 5.3-RELEASE, the
             5-STABLE branch is expected to be created, and
             &os.current; will become 6-CURRENT.  If a little ASCII art
             would help, this is how it looks:</para>


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: