docs/68595: [PATCH] add FAQ entry for lock order reversals

[Mark Linimon]

On Monday 02 August 2004 12:28 am, Murray Stokely wrote:
> The submitter did not send in a glossary entry.  It's true that we may
> want to add LOR to a glossary at some point, but as proved by the
> mailing list thread from which this submission was taken, this is in
> fact a frequently asked question.  This is very appropriate for the
> troubleshooting section of the FAQ as is.

Um, I definitely recall adding LOR to the glossary some weeks ago,
including a pointer to the collected LOR page.

mcl