docs/52547: [patch] Cleanup of laptop article

[Marc Fonvieille]

On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 02:02:18AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
[...]
> 
> They're only useful if the article contains a "table of contents" near
> the top, or other parts of our docs want to refer to parts of the
> article.  Then the links will be more sensible if we *do* use id=""
> keywords.  For instance, this is why I recently added id="" parts to all
> the <section> elements of the pr-guidelines article.
> 
> Having those id keywords there also has another advantage.  People who
> link to the FreeBSD.org docs collection from external sites won't be
> surprised after a while to find that all their links point to the wrong
> and incomprehensible URI http://www.freebsd.org/.../lala.html#AE987623.
> 
> For an article that doesn't contain a TOC, I agree with Marc though.
>

True, some articles need the id thing, some others not.

Marc

PS: For everyone, I'm not sure you will get this mail :) I'm
experiencing a lot of mail and DNS issues since few days.  So do not
be surprise if I don't answer or if I do an "out of sync" answer etc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/attachments/20030524/dc225b73/attachment.sig>