.Xr references to ports in man pages
Tom Rhodes
trhodes at FreeBSD.org
Tue Apr 29 17:42:47 UTC 2003
On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:33:17 +0300
Ruslan Ermilov <ru at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 11:29:15PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote:
> >
> > So, are we going to work on this?
> >
> We already do. The only thing I miss is how people would like
> it to be rendered, and I just need more opinions (more voices).
> I hoped that ports@ and doc@ (not necessarily committers)
> developers would suggest something, or agree on the proposed
> one.
With every hat I can fit on my head (wow, don't I look funny) I
want to say we should do it in a similar fasion to how we do it
in the doc project. Use things like:
.Xr net/cvsup
and render accordingly. Then we can parse the the MOVED file in
the ports collection and boom. While it sounds much simpler than
doing, I think it should be moved forward. :)
>
> > Perhaps this should be thrown at doceng?
> >
> Not needed; doceng is not for this sort of things and would like
> such discussions to take place in doc at .
Ok. I figured it was, or could be considered a doceng issue since it
does have to deal with documentation. I'm more informed now, please
carry on. :)
>
>
> With my doceng@ hat on,
Can I `borrow' that hat for about five minutes please? :)
--
Tom Rhodes
More information about the freebsd-doc
mailing list