Little UFS2 FAQ

[Jim Brown]

* Chris Pepper <pepper at reppep.com> [2003-04-27 18:47]:
> At 2:17 AM -0400 2003/04/26, Jim Brown wrote:
> 
[snips below...]
> 
> 	I've taken a look at the FAQ. My suggested patch is at the bottom of this message, but there are a few bits I don't have proposed fixes for.

Patched- thanks.

> 
> 	Program names (like fsck) need to be tagged.

I ran into trouble trying to get &man.fsck_ffs.8 to validate.  I'll research this
later- but it looks on the surface that &man.foo_bar.# has problems validating.
Does anyone else have this problem?


> 	This explanation is much needed, but not detailed enough. Are they both really considered 'file systems'?


Added the link to the original FFS paper.


> 
> 	State whether fsck is UFS2-friendly.

Answered in the article.  Apparently you need a new superblock as well.

> 
> 
> 	NetBSD mentions should include the version when UFS2 was introduced.

I'll try to find out...


Thanks for the review!

Best Regards,
jpb
===