Chainsawing the "Mouse" section of the FAQ
Nik Clayton
nik at freebsd.org
Thu Apr 10 14:16:39 UTC 2003
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 12:09:43PM -0700, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
> "Michael W . Lucas" <mwlucas at blackhelicopters.org> writes:
> > Any comments?
>
> Sure. Your considerable talents would be better spent on the FreeBSD
> Handbook. The FAQ should be a delete-only document. The sooner it rots
> away, the better. It's upkeep involves a duplication of effort that is
> worse than useless, as it tends to force FreeBSD users to have to hunt
> for information in an extra place for information that is not
> necessarily any more helpful than what the Handbook (or an Article) has
> (or should have). It's bad enough that the FDP has to duplicate so much
> of what xfree86.org has on mouse configuration, but that's given the
> existance and nature of "moused", I guess there's no alternative to
> that.
Hmm.
I quite like the idea of the FAQ merging in to the Handbook.
Each chapter starts with a "Synopsis" section -- there's no reason why
they couldn't end with a "FAQ" section. If we wanted a separate FAQ
document, it could be generated by pulling out all the FAQ sections from
the Handbook.
N
--
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.freebsd.org/ (__)
FreeBSD Documentation Project http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/ \\\'',)
\/ \ ^
--- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F 94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 --- .\._/_)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/attachments/20030410/ec2e035f/attachment.sig>
More information about the freebsd-doc
mailing list