Oracle 8i (8.1.7), FreeBSD 5.1 i386 installation questions
Jon Adams
jkadams at computer.org
Sun Oct 31 05:12:30 PST 2004
Dima,
Thanks for the response, but I do have libdl
east# ls -l /compat/linux/lib | grep dl
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 65473 Mar 6 2003 libdl-2.2.4.so
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 Jul 26 15:25 libdl.so.2 -> libdl-2.2.4.so
for some reason its not seeing it though. One of the first things I did
post-install was enable linux emulation and install dev-tools,
needed it to get my J2SDK and Tomcat up and running.
I also rebuilt the kernel with the Oracle settings for Shared Memory and
Semaphores
do I need to put a -L somewhere in the oracle files, do I need to modify
my LD_INCLUDE_PATH ?
my paths looks like this:
PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/data/oracle/bin:/compat/linux/bin:/compat/linux/sbin:/compat/linux/usr/bin:/compat/linux/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/ora/app/bin
SSH_TTY=/dev/ttyp1
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/ora/app/lib
my oracle sources are in /data/oracle/Disk1, I am installing it in /ora
I am hoping to move to 5.3 as soon as I get the chance... but I need
the DBMS online like yesterday
I am thinking this is something small, but since I am a recent convert
to FreeBSD, I just dont know where to look to fix it.
Dima Dorfman wrote:
>Jon Adams <jkadams at computer.org> wrote:
>
>
>>bash-2.04$ ./setup_stubs.sh
>>Setting up patch files...done.
>>Patching makefiles as necessary:
>>
>>
>...
>
>
>>Rebuilding client shared library...ld: cannot find -ldl
>>
>>
>>Now I know -ldl is for the dlopen function in Linux, which are in a
>>different place than in FreeBSD,
>>
>>
>
>You should be compiling and running everything Oracle-related under
>Linux emulation, and if you installed the linux_devtools port, you
>should have libdl in /compat/linux/lib. I suspect that either you
>aren't running under Linux emulation or that you don't have that port
>installed.
>
>
>
>>BTW: please do not tell me to try Oracle 9i, or that I should use
>>another version of FreeBSD, or something like that, I am locked in this
>>hardware and OS, so I need to get it to work with the current setup as
>>much as possible.
>>
>>
>
>If you're stuck then you're stuck, but I really would recommend trying
>to at least get away from 5.1, which really wasn't a production-
>quality release.
>
>
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
More information about the freebsd-database
mailing list