etcupdate, svnlite, documentation etc. following the transition of source to Git
Warner Losh
imp at bsdimp.com
Sat Jan 2 16:50:57 UTC 2021
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 8:43 AM Graham Perrin <grahamperrin at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02/01/2021 08:47, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
>
> >> <
> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html>
> >> still describes use of `svnlite` (not `git` or `got`) and, I guess,
> >> might continue to do so for some time.
> >>
> >> In this context, is `cd /usr/src` still true?
> > If you clone the repository to /usr/src instead of e.g.
> > /usr/src/freebsd-current.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> I imagine that use cases will _eventually_ include trios of directories,
> as siblings, for example:
>
> /usr/src/doc /usr/src/freebsd-stable
>
> /usr/src/ports
>
> True: there's the tradition of /usr/ports
>
> however with all three things moved, or moving, to Git it seems (to me)
> sensible to have the source files for ports at
>
> /usr/src/ports
>
> For consistency. A cohesive approach.
>
There's no change. The current preferred way is to clone into /usr all
three repos....
/usr/src
/usr/doc
/usr/ports
One is, of course, free to put things where one wants, but that's no
different than with svn.
Warner
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list