Is "/usr/bin/sscop" still relevant? (related to ATM)

[Warner Losh]

So both the kernel and userland parts can go away?

./contrib/ngatm/sscop
./sys/modules/netgraph/atm/sscop
./sys/netgraph/atm/sscop
./usr.bin/atm/sscop

Warner

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 1:27 AM <Hartmut.Brandt at dlr.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> this can go away. It is the transport protocol underlying ATM signaling.
>
> harti
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-current at freebsd.org <owner-freebsd-current at freebsd.org>
> On Behalf Of mj-mailinglist at gmx.de
> Sent: Monday, November 9, 2020 10:07 PM
> To: freebsd-current at freebsd.org
> Subject: Is "/usr/bin/sscop" still relevant? (related to ATM)
>
> Is "/usr/bin/sscop" still relevant? The sscop tool implements the Q.2110
> transport protocol, which is used in ATM-Networks.
> The NATM framework was removed in April 2017, but sscop depends on
> netgraph (libngatm.so.4), so it seems to be independent from NATM.
>
> The manpage refers to libunimsg(3), which does not exist, but unimsg(3)
> does.
> It also depends on libngatm.so.4, which also does not have a man page.
>
> So, is it still useful? The most documents i found about ATM are from the
> early 2000 to mid 2010s.
>
> --
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>