Optimization bug with floating-point?

[John Baldwin]

On 3/13/19 8:16 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 07:45:41PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>
>> gcc8 --version
>> gcc8 (FreeBSD Ports Collection) 8.3.0
>>
>> gcc8 -fno-builtin -o z a.c -lm && ./z
>> gcc8 -O -fno-builtin -o z a.c -lm && ./z
>> gcc8 -O2 -fno-builtin -o z a.c -lm && ./z
>> gcc8 -O3 -fno-builtin -o z a.c -lm && ./z
>>
>> Max ULP: 2.297073
>> Count: 0           (# of ULP that exceed 21)
>>
> 
> clang agrees with gcc8 if one changes ...
> 
>> int
>> main(void)
>> {
>>    double re, im, u, ur, ui;
>>    float complex f;
>>    float x, y;
> 
> this line to "volatile float x, y".

So it seems to be a regression in clang 7 vs clang 6?

-- 
John Baldwin