[package - head-i386-default][sysutils/lsof] Failed for lsof-4.93.2_2,8 in build
Konstantin Belousov
kostikbel at gmail.com
Thu Jul 25 19:18:41 UTC 2019
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 02:10:46PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 07/25/2019 1:40 pm, Justin Hibbits wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:35:32 -0600
> > Alan Somers <asomers at freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:13 PM Larry Rosenman <ler at freebsd.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 07/25/2019 1:10 pm, Alan Somers wrote:
> >> > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:05 PM Larry Rosenman <ler at freebsd.org>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Um.... Who broke this?
> > ...
> >> > > "svn blame" suggests r350199 by kib. However, refcount.h should
> >> > > only be included if lsof defines _KERNEL, which normal programs
> >> > > shouldn't. So I think this should be considered a bug in lsof.
> >> > > -Alan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > we *HAVE* to define _KERNEL, to get at the kernel structures.....
> >>
> >> Then I think you have to live with this amount of instability.
> >> refcount(9) says that you should include <sys/param.h>. Did you do
> >> that? If so, then this is a man page bug and refcount(9) should also
> >> specify stdbool.h.
> >> -Alan
> >
> > <sys/param.h> includes <sys/types.h> already, which typedefs bool. So
> > <sys/param.h> should suffice to include in lsof.
> >
> > - Justin
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-current at freebsd.org mailing list
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
> Thanks all! I've got a PR into the lsof repo, and I'll fix it there.
>
> If we can't get a release out in the next day or 2, I'll patch it in the
> port.
>
> https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof/pull/70
Absolutely minimal change to accomodate updated refcount.h would be
inclusion of stdbool.h.
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list