kernel module code coverage
Michael Tuexen
tuexen at freebsd.org
Thu Aug 8 15:14:15 UTC 2019
> On 8. Aug 2019, at 16:16, Slava Shwartsman <slavash at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 08-Aug-19 16:52, Alan Somers wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 7:42 AM Michael Tuexen <tuexen at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 8. Aug 2019, at 14:24, Slava Shwartsman <slavash at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Apparently, Bullseye are dropping support for FreeBSD.
>>>>
>>>> We are looking for an alternative for kernel module run time analysis.
>>>> Mostly interested in code coverage (for now).
>>>>
>>>> Any suggestions that work for you?
>>> Have you looked into /dev/kcov. This is used by SYZKALLER for getting
>>> coverage information from the kernel.
>>>
>
> Thanks.
> Is there a man page for /dev/kcov?
I don't think so. There was no man page in the commit which introduced the feature:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=342962
You might want to look at:
https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/tools/kcovtrace/kcovtrace.c
how to use it.
Best regards
Michael
>
>>> Best regards
>>> Michael
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Slava
>> That's part of Matt Macy's gcov project, right?. However, while it
>> works for the kernel itself, it doesn't work for modules.
>
> In worst case, I can build my module into the kernel, right?
>
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239194
>> -Alan
>
>
> Slava
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list