ino64? r318606 -> r318739 OK; r318739 -> r318781 fails SIGSEGV

[David Wolfskill]

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 05:16:38PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 06:59:05AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:35:58PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > If build of r318739 succed, can you try, please, to rebuild the current
> > > latest sources, but now with reverted r318750 ?
> > 
> > It did complete successfully.
> > 
> > I have updated /usr/src back to 318781, then started a new build.
> So are you building stock 318781, or did you reverted r318750 ?

Stock 318781 [*].  I revert as a (nearly) last resort. :-)

> > While it has not yet completed ">>> stage 4.2: building libraries", it
> > is well beyond the provious point of failure (again, building parts of
> > clang/libllvm).
> > 
> > I'm reporting now, as I'll need to head in to work fairly soon.  I
> > should be able to report definitively a bit later.

It's completed the ">>> stage 4.2: building libraries" part, and well
into ">>> stage 4.3: building everything".

* Save for my (usual) hacking of conf/newvers.sh a bit.

And now I really do need to head in to work.

Peace,
david
-- 
David H. Wolfskill				david at catwhisker.org
"[T]he president’s improper efforts to influence an ongoing investigation"

See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 603 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20170524/c7c800be/attachment.sig>