CURRENT: net/igb broken

[Sean Bruno]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512



On 09/18/15 10:20, Eric Joyner wrote:
> He has an i210 -- he would want to revert e1000_i210.[ch], too.
> 
> Sorry for the thrash Sean -- it sounds like it would be a good idea
> for you should revert this patch, and Jeff and I can go look at
> trying these shared code updates and igb changes internally again.
> We at Intel really could've done a better job of making sure these
> changes worked across a wider variety of devices.
> 
> - Eric

I've reverted the changes to head.  I'll reopen the reviews and we can
proceed from there.

sean


> 
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:50 AM Sean Bruno <sbruno at freebsd.org 
> <mailto:sbruno at freebsd.org>> wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>> r287762 broke the system
> 
> 
> Before I revert this changeset *again* can you test revert r287762
> from if_igb.c, e1000_82575.c and e1000_82575.h *only*
> 
> That narrows down the change quite a bit.
> 
> sean _______________________________________________ 
> freebsd-current at freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-current at freebsd.org> 
> mailing list 
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To
> unsubscribe, send any mail to 
> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org 
> <mailto:freebsd-current-unsubscribe at freebsd.org>"
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=
=JTMu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----