WITNESS observes 2 LORs on Boot of Release 10.1
Ellis H. Wilson III
ellisw at panasas.com
Mon Nov 24 19:20:50 UTC 2014
On 11/22/2014 03:51 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014, Ellis H. Wilson III wrote:
>
>> Before I start, and this is mainly geared to my responder Benjamin Kaduk,
>> based on your response, are you suggesting that the cnputc WITNESS panic you
>> expected to happen is now completely unavoidable in FreeBSD 10? I.E., is this
>> a spinlock that WITNESS falls over each time but that is provably deadlock
>> free that the developers have decided cannot be BLESSED for some reason?
>
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-January/031316.html
> looks to be a better explanation than the previous link I sent ... in
> short, console output is hard.
>
>> I guess I just can't wrap my head around why we would ever move to a regime
>> where SKIPSPIN is the default for testing... That just seems like an open
>> invitation for introducing spinlock regressions.
>
> I don't think anyone made the conscious decision to do that, it just
> happened by default as no one spent the time to fix the aforementioned
> issue.
>
>> Moving onto the LORs I'm seeing, a question I have as a newbie to WITNESS
>> debugging is how exactly to interpret the output if I see a stacktrace and
>> then a LOR output like the following:
>>
>> lock order reversal:
>> 1st 0xffffffff81633d88 entropy harvest mutex (entropy harvest mutex) @
>> /usr/src/sys/dev/random/random_harvestq.c:198
>> 2nd 0xffffffff813b6208 scrlock (scrlock) @
>> /usr/src/sys/dev/syscons/syscons.c:2682
>>
>> Does this mean WITNESS has already stored an ordering of #1 harvest_mtx then
>> #2 scp->scr_lock, and somewhere somebody tried to lock scp->scr_lock without
>> first getting harvest_mtx? Or the reverse (WITNESS previously recorded
>> scrlock and then harvest and the lines it spit out were the offenders?)
>
> I believe it is the latter (the ordering being printed is the bad one
> which caused WITNESS to complain).
Thanks so much for the additional info Ben. This fleshes out the
history of this issue for me significantly. I have filed a bug on this at:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195262
Xin Li was able to identify the ordering that caused the problem and
proposed a possible patch to fix it. I can confirm that now I'm booting
with solely WITNESS (i.e., not WITNESS_SKIPSPIN) without panic.
Thanks!
ellis
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list