Status of llvm/clang 3.4?

[Ed Maste]

On 4 March 2014 12:22, Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 12:17:18PM +0000, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > What is the current status of clang, regarding known bugs, on FreeBSD-current?
> >
> > There were reports of www/firefox failing to build because of bug in llvm.
>
> Still broken of i386.  Given the google results for "llvm ud2"
> it is likely that clang will never be fixed.

Except in this case it's just a plain old Clang bug, not a general
undefined behaviour issue.  The Clang PR is here:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19007

Dimitry has a patch to work around the issue in FreeBSD PR 187103:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=187103