UDP Lite support

[Joe Nosay]

On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Joe Nosay <superbisquit at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Joe Nosay <superbisquit at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Joe Nosay <superbisquit at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Xin Li <delphij at delphij.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA512
>>>>
>>>> On 3/2/14, 10:42 AM, Joe Nosay wrote:
>>>> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Joe Nosay <superbisquit at gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Xin Li <delphij at delphij.net>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> > On 02/26/14 18:52, Joe Nosay wrote:
>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Brooks Davis
>>>> >>>>> <brooks at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:36:29PM -0500, Joe Nosay
>>>> >>>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>> The last thread on this was in 2006. Has it ever been
>>>> >>>>>>> reconsidered or is the likelihood of too many damaged
>>>> >>>>>>> packets the reason for not supporting? I'm not sure
>>>> >>>>>>> where to put this question. Apologies for the noise.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> You've provided next to no context.  What is the
>>>> >>>>>> question?  What thread are you referring to?  If this is
>>>> >>>>>> the usual UDP then freebsd-net would be vastly more
>>>> >>>>>> appropriate than -current.
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> -- Brooks
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Thanks. I will ask kevlo and maybe bring it up on
>>>> >>>>> freebsd-net. It has to do with an implementation of the
>>>> >>>>> JACK server using UDP Lite for transferring data.
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/UDP-lite-for-FreeBSD-td4010236.html
>>>> >
>>>> >  Looks
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> > like nobody proposed a patch?
>>>> >
>>>> > I think the concern was that this is not very useful in real-world
>>>> > scenarios due to link layer error detection mechanism but that
>>>> > doesn't raise a red flag to me assuming this is sufficiently self
>>>> > contained feature as it would improve compatibility with other
>>>> > operating systems.
>>>> >
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> https://github.com/torelizer/jack_trauma
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Not my project;  but, I want to port it to FreeBSD. First is to
>>>> >> get it to build from source. Use  your raspberry pi with FreeBSD
>>>> >> to broadcast your tunes and all.
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks for all of the input. The project is being reworked to
>>>> > improve the code.
>>>>
>>>> Kevin Lo have a patchset but needs someone to do performance testing
>>>> (its impact on non-UDPLite applications), test with vimage, etc:
>>>>
>>>>         http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/udplite.diff
>>>>         http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/udp-v.diff
>>>>
>>>> Are you interested in working on these and report back?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>
>>>> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTE4+mAAoJEJW2GBstM+nsthoQAIW67l7yDfIPvxDsNIWWJcRd
>>>> 8brFYCAOPYE4LpuLGjtSgy370aBe9JmwAm41tE4qF0WhGpcu6TLsKjgMGWa/lHCc
>>>> JId8+WBfbbQT8XJj/d+3oOETn5/rglvlRhJbnNIwaQpTXxuMC5oz2nGW7rIpIkaA
>>>> OHo0D20DzGj4nxrQvijZ7DsMkk3F+KJu/4p7M6lpsIPCakknW1WD7IHRfbZ4Oldz
>>>> 2xH4HfIk7cAdA7i/YUNjlpSgWFQ5OU03J5HAYfC6W37wiGbjdBYf/PKVhJ8hz7+D
>>>> OCl+yCV00u4fCjlY6zXFea9pGr7Cl1P+sapwKDZ4g+NpNHxBUVY+ahbjQUHYON2W
>>>> sdzAsLpMMqavCr1o8mcXdm7IPRlLUK9QZUySC9DitPvoF8G2llTAz1mWa4/Oj7/S
>>>> JMiUERcaL5gdFN8EgEKkamFgLJguYquAjGtiowa51EMbnZG0Q2yWUcrEBFHWBEZT
>>>> RW1u6r4ChIrPE9X5ljfFpQyKG6jFhYFXG+iVlgTB7F2ZWhjPAXi/tLbBnvIcci1m
>>>> Md4XFm/bBJj/yNXdPuCi+CtvvdpZ/d4LQn4B7By5bIo1QjCb4Zx5n2Tq5xnYZUOI
>>>> CnSVnNSkwLbbrAVtYOVWnrSuwR33JQnqeGHdM+XYBBwKBRhrx+ZgFWD7N6Gm95PU
>>>> xXSxkgYVXI4sgi7Lh3Ia
>>>> =2Vmc
>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have on patch file that Lo sent. Three different files are on it with
>>> the assumption that the patch-root is /usr/src. I'm thinking about snipping
>>> it twice and then applying each subpatch within the proper subdirectory.
>>> Now, this would not when Index:reference is at the header of each, right?
>>>
>>  One not one in first sentence. Insert hurt between not & when in last
>> sentence.
>>
>>  I'm doing patch -p *.diff and the process is taking some time. What am I
> doing wrong?
>
 Syntax.
Rebuild reinstall the source portions in common then find an application
that uses udplite, right?
"Duhhhh."
Thanks.
"Yuhhh"