zfs send/recv: STILL invalid Backup Stream
Allan Jude
allanjude at freebsd.org
Thu Jul 24 23:56:10 UTC 2014
On 2014-07-24 16:11, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 2014-07-24 15:07, Allan Jude wrote:
>> On 2014-07-24 15:57, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>> On 2014-07-24 14:53, Mark Martinec wrote:
>>>> 2014-07-24 21:31, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>>>> borg.lerctr.org /home/ler # zxfer -dFkPvs -g 376 -O
>>>>> root at tbh.lerctr.org -R zroot zroot/backups/TBH
>>>>> Creating recursive snapshot zroot at zxfer_26699_20140724135840.
>>>>> Checking grandfather status of all snapshots marked for deletion...
>>>>> Grandfather check passed.
>>>>> Sending zroot at zxfer_26699_20140724135840 to zroot/backups/TBH/zroot.
>>>>> Sending zroot/ROOT at zxfer_26699_20140724135840 to
>>>>> zroot/backups/TBH/zroot/ROOT.
>>>>> Sending zroot/ROOT/default at zxfer_23699_20140724134435 to
>>>>> zroot/backups/TBH/zroot/ROOT/default.
>>>>> Sending zroot/ROOT/default at zxfer_26699_20140724135840 to
>>>>> zroot/backups/TBH/zroot/ROOT/default.
>>>>> (incremental to zroot/ROOT/default at zxfer_23699_20140724134435.)
>>>>> Sending zroot/home at zxfer_26699_20140724135840 to
>>>>> zroot/backups/TBH/zroot/home.
>>>>
>>>>> Write failed: Cannot allocate memory
>>>> ====================================
>>>>
>>>>> cannot receive new filesystem stream: invalid backup stream
>>>>> Error when zfs send/receiving.
>>>>> borg.lerctr.org /home/ler #
>>>>>
>>>>> well that's different.......
>>>>
>>>> Sounds familiar, check my posting of today and links therein:
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2014-July/039347.html
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>> I'm not using netgraph to the best of my knowledge....
>>> and the only fails on the SENDING host are:
>>> 8 Bucket: 64, 0, 41, 3555, 257774, 11, 0
>>> 12 Bucket: 96, 0, 96, 2569, 123653, 0, 0
>>> 16 Bucket: 128, 0, 17195, 506, 215573, 0, 0
>>> 32 Bucket: 256, 0, 340, 4670, 900638, 50, 0
>>> 64 Bucket: 512, 0, 10691, 365,
>>> 546888,185232, 0
>>> 128 Bucket: 1024, 0, 3563, 905, 348419, 0, 0
>>> 256 Bucket: 2048, 0, 2872, 162,
>>> 249995,59834, 0
>>> vmem btag: 56, 0, 192811, 51500, 502264,1723, 0
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I regularly use zxfer to transfer 500+ GiB datasets over the internet.
>> This week I actually replicated a 2.1 TiB dataset with zxfer without
>> issue.
>>
>> I wonder which thing is running out of memory. Is there a delay while it
>> is 'running out of memory', or does it fail immediately? Does running
>> top while it is working on running out of memory reveal anything?
>>
>> I would expect to use up a lot of memory while doing deduplication, but
>> not otherwise.
>>
>> Note: I most often use openssh-portable rather than base ssh for
>> replication, as I enable the nonecipher to reduce CPU usage, and adjust
>> the TcpRcvBuf upwards to actually saturate a gigabit over the internet.
>
> I wasn't watching exactly what it was doing, but the sending box has 16G
> and 18G Swap and swap
> has NOT been touched.
>
> last pid: 74288; load averages: 4.70, 5.61, 5.91 up 1+03:14:18
> 15:10:44
> 115 processes: 3 running, 112 sleeping
> CPU: 0.6% user, 33.3% nice, 0.6% system, 0.1% interrupt, 65.4% idle
> Mem: 847M Active, 761M Inact, 14G Wired, 4616K Cache, 357M Free
> ARC: 12G Total, 6028M MFU, 5281M MRU, 3152K Anon, 120M Header, 688M Other
> Swap: 18G Total, 18G Free
>
> so I have zero idea where to go here.
>
>
Most ZFS memory usage is 'wired' and so cannot be swapped, so lack of
swap activity isn't a good indicator.
--
Allan Jude
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 899 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/attachments/20140724/1ae84465/attachment.sig>
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list