src.conf ignored; phantom named

[Yuri Pankov]

On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 15:43:44 +0000, Chris Rees wrote:

> On 2 March 2012 23:09, Yuri Pankov<yuri.pankov at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 17:41:28 -0500, Rotate 13 wrote:
>>
>>> I set WITHOUT_BIND="yes" in /etc/src.conf, and built/installed world.
>>> Not only does /usr/sbin/named exist - named is actually started!
>>> Several other WITHOUT_* variables also were apparently ignored, as
>>> evidenced by stuff installed on running system.
>>>
>>> My main question is - how do I debug this?  I have been combing over
>>> makefiles under /usr/src (not to mention, going through /etc/rc.d/
>>> trying to figure out what actually started named).  As far as I
>>> ascertain, _WITHOUT_SRCCONF is *not* set anywhere for world building;
>>> named_enable="no" in relevant rc.conf files; rpcbind and ntpd are not
>>> running either.  Since named daemonized, it's not easy to tell who
>>> started it - and grepping everything in sight, I can't figure out how
>>> it got built in the first place.
>>>
>>> uname -a:
>>> FreeBSD xyz.example.com 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Feb 29
>>> 10:28:17 CST 2012    root at xyz.example.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM
>>> amd64
>>>
>>> I focused substantial attention on /usr/src/share/bsd.own.mk and
>>> worked outward; but did not find anything obvious.
>>>
>>> Advice on where to poke for the right information, much appreciated.
>>
>>
>> src.conf controls what is (not) built. To actually remove the bits marked as
>> WITHOUT_ from the system, try running `make delete-old` in /usr/src.
>
> Has the behaviour of make delete-old changed?  As far as I can
> remember, it doesn't remove stuff marked as WITHOUT_ --it's there to
> deal with updates.

ObsoleteFiles.inc also includes 
tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc, which defines the file lists 
for various WITH_|WITHOUT_ options.