Experiences with FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2
Brett Glass
brett at lariat.net
Mon Sep 26 23:09:35 UTC 2011
At 04:38 PM 9/26/2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>There was also general sentiment that the rise of ZFS would allow
>just this sort of fine-grained partitioning, which is a huge
>advantage of its ability to create datasets on the fly. This
>perception that ZFS is most of the future probably contributed to
>the lack of strong opinions regarding the default UFS partition scheme.
Unfortunately, because ZFS is licensed under a viral license (not
the GPL, but nonetheless one that isn't compatible with the BSD
philosophy), I wouldn't want to see this happen. I'd rather see
Hammer backported from Dragonfly.
--Brett
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list