ports on 10.0-CURRENT: r226027 is incorrect fix

[Stanislav Sedov]

On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:04:19 -0700
Stanislav Sedov <stas at FreeBSD.org> mentioned:

> On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:35:13 +0100
> Chris Rees <utisoft at gmail.com> mentioned:
> 
> > 
> > Last I heard, portmgr explicitly disapproved of this fix-- have I missed
> > something??? Erwin specifically said not to do it.
> > 
> > Since when can anyone just commit stuff to bsd.port.mk, regardless of its
> > location?
> > 
> > This is a bad solution, please revert it or I will when I get back. We're
> > going to end up being asked to support it on ports@ otherwise.
> > 
> 
> You certianly missed something, including the rationale behind the portmgr@
> descision of not committing to the ports tree (!) bsd.port.mk.  Go find
> some useful work to do like deleting old ports or whatever.  You might want
> to consider deleting all mine ports, as I'm not going to support them anymore
> (after you backed out this fix without approval I don't have a working ports
> tree anymore on any of my 3 workstations).
> 

Quoting myself.

Sorry to all if this sounded rude, I might have overreacted.
I didn't meant to be personal, it's just the whole situation
is disappointing.

-- 
Stanislav Sedov
ST4096-RIPE

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail 
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments