status of WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL
Garrett Cooper
yanegomi at gmail.com
Fri Mar 11 00:23:16 UTC 2011
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Alexander Best <arundel at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Thu Mar 10 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Alexander Best <arundel at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> > hi there,
>> >
>> > just wanted to ask what the current situation on WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL is? it
>> > seems the option gets completely ignored after a recent commit.
>> >
>> > should src.conf be adjusted to mention that WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL == noop or
>> > should the option be completely removed?
>> >
>> > also in usr.sbin/Makefile, the sysinstall entry should be moved upwards to the
>> > other non-optional build directories imo.
>>
>> The build didn't even really function when specifying
>> WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL before Nate's recent commits -- so why worry about
>> the state of things?
>
> due to inconsistency? src.conf says WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL will not build
> sysinstall(1). that's obviously wrong.
I think this context was forgotten:
http://markmail.org/message/fk2xqlrtvljjo3rf
Also:
$ find /usr/src/ -name 'Makefile*' | xargs grep WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL
$ echo $?
1
$ svn info /usr/src/ | grep Revision | sed 's,Revision: ,,'
219120
Doesn't look like this sentinel is honored anywhere.
Thanks,
-Garrett
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list