Heavy I/O blocks FreeBSD box for several seconds
Andriy Gapon
avg at FreeBSD.org
Thu Jul 7 07:13:39 UTC 2011
on 06/07/2011 21:00 Steve Kargl said the following:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:05:41PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <20110706170132.GA68775 at troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Steve Kargl w
>> rites:
>>
>>> I periodically ran the same type test in the 2008 post over the
>>> last three years. Nothing has changed. I even set up an account
>>> on one node in my cluster for jeffr to use. He was too busy to
>>> investigate at that time.
>>
>> Isn't this just the lemming-syncer hurling every dirty block over
>> the cliff at the same time ?
>
> I don't know the answer. Of course, having no experience in
> processing scheduling, I don't understand the question either ;-)
I think that Poul-Henning was speaking in the vein of the subject line where I/O
is somehow involved.
I admit I would also love to hear more details in more technical terms (without
lemmings and cliffs) :-)
> AFAICT, it is a cpu affinity issue. If I launch n+1 MPI images
> on a system with n cpus/cores, then 2 (and sometimes 3) images
> are stuck on a cpu and those 2 (or 3) images ping-pong on that
> cpu. I recall trying to use renice(8) to force some load
> balancing, but vaguely remember that it did not help.
Your issue seems to be about a specific case of purely CPU-bound loads.
It is very relevant to ULE, but perhaps not to this particular thread.
>> To find out: Run gstat and keep and eye on the leftmost column
>>
>> The road map for fixing that has been known for years...
I would love to hear more about this.
A link to a past discussion, if any, would suffice.
--
Andriy Gapon
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list