acpi_resource bug?

[Michael Butler]

On 02/14/11 10:29, Matthew Fleming wrote:
>>> 1) should the length of the bcopy() be changed to either respect
>>> res->Length or the actual length of the ACPI_RESOURCE_DATA for the
>>> type?
>>
>> It should just use res->Length:
> 
> Is there a guarantee that res->Length is <= sizeof(ACPI_RESOURCE) ?

I don't know if it's related or a different bug ..

If I run 'acpidump -t', I get a core-dump and ..

 [ .. snip .. ]

/*
  MCFG: Length=60, Revision=1, Checksum=74,
        OEMID=INTEL, OEM Table ID=CALISTGA, OEM Revision=0x6040000,
        Creator ID=LOHR, Creator Revision=0x5a

        Base Address=0x00000000e0000000
        Segment Group=0x0000
        Start Bus=0
        End Bus=255
 */
/*
  TCPA: Length=50, Revision=1, Checksum=153,
        OEMID=PTLTD, OEM Table ID=CALISTGA, OEM Revision=0x6040000,
        Creator ID= PTL, Creator Revision=0x1
        Class 0 Base Address 0x0 Length 65536

        -268370093 0xc3e200f053ff00f053ff00f054ff00f0de9100f0 [<unknown
0xf000ff53>]