{arch}/conf/DEFAULTS and uart
Alexander Best
arundel at freebsd.org
Thu Sep 9 19:41:09 UTC 2010
On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
>
> except for arm most archs seem to enforce uart support in conf/DEFAULTS. is
> this really necessary? shouldn't DEFAULTS only contain vital devices/options
> without a kernel on a specific arch won't function at all?
jhb just explained to me, that the uart entry in DEFAULTS is not a controller
or something like that, but the uart backend to use *if* uart gets defined in
the kernel config.
sorry for the noise folks.
cheers.
alex
>
> cheers.
> alex
>
> --
> a13x
--
a13x
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list