Tricky subversion import, what to do?

[Ulrich Spörlein]

On Sun, 07.11.2010 at 17:18:43 +0000, Tony Finch wrote:
> > this is about importing unifdef 2.4, which has no significant code
> > changes, but that's not the point.
> 
> I maintain unifdef and I haven't imported 2.4 because there are no code
> changes. Please leave it alone.

As I wrote, that's beside the point and not the question at hand.
How/where should it end up in our tree? Is it vendor code? Is it contrib
code? And if so how to bootstrap the correct subversion history ...

Uli