Hopefully Simple Question on Debugging Kernel Modules
Scott Long
scottl at samsco.org
Mon Feb 23 10:04:20 PST 2009
John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday 23 February 2009 12:10:07 pm Scott Long wrote:
>> John Baldwin wrote:
>>> On Friday 20 February 2009 6:40:56 pm David Christensen wrote:
>>>> I'm sure this is a simple question but the answer is alluding my Google
>>>> search capabilities. My driver is being loaded as a kernel module and
>>>> is failing with the following error:
>>>>
>>>> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
>>>> cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
>>>> fault virtual address = 0xfffffffe40abe9dc
>>>> fault code = supervisor write data, page not present
>>>> instruction pointer = 0x8:0xffffffff920b638f
>>>> stack pointer = 0x10:0xffffffff9212bb10
>>>> frame pointer = 0x10:0xffffffff9212bbb0
>>>> code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
>>>> = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
>>>> processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
>>>> current process = 12 (irq268: bce0)
>>>> [thread pid 12 tid 100166 ]
>>>> Stopped at bce_intr+0x8df: addl $0x1,0x2c854(%r12,%rax,4)
>>>> db>
>>>>
>>>> I simply need to find the offending source line in my driver. Not sure
>>>> how I've managed to get the driver running at all without this but it's
>>>> time to do things the right way. I have KDB/DDB/GDB built into my
>>>> -CURRENT kernel already. It'd be great to find the source line while in
>>>> the kernel debugger but I'm also fine with rebooting the system to
>>>> identify the line number.
>>> Just use gdb on bce.ko (built with debug symbols):
>>>
>>> gdb /path/to/if_bce.ko
>>> (gdb) l *bce_intr+0x8df
>>>
>>> If you get a crashdump you can run kgdb on it and just walk up to the
> relevant
>>> stack frame and use 'l' there to get a listing.
>>>
>> One thing that I've never figured out is how debugging symbols are
>> handled in module builds these days. If I go to /sys/modules/bce and
>> do 'make', it generates a .ko and explicitly strips it. I wind up
>> having to re-run the link command by hand so I get symbols. What is
>> the correct way to do this? Note that I'm not interested in answers
>> that involve "go to /usr/src and run make buildkernel" =-)
>
> make DEBUG_FLAGS=-g is what I use. The same thing works for userland tools
> and the kernel (usually we put 'makeoptions DEBUG_FLAGS=-g' in a kernel
> config so it is "automatic" for kernels though).
>
Ah, I was still using 'CFLAGS+= -g". Thanks to you and Mr. Campbell for
the tip.
Scott
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list