pf and carp, BACKUP host dropping connection
Stanislav Sedov
stas at FreeBSD.org
Tue Apr 21 08:37:36 UTC 2009
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:21:10 +0200
Sebastiaan van Erk <sebster at sebster.com> mentioned:
> Hi,
>
> I have 3 hosts set up with 1 virtual IP using carp. I don't yet have
> pfsync (which I'm planning to do next). However, there is a strange
> behavior that I cannot understand.
>
> The 3 machines are all gateways between two networks and have 2 VIP ips
> which are used for routing (actually they have 4 networks and 4 VIPs,
> but only 2 are relevant in this case). When I ssh from one network to
> the other however, connections are sometimes blocked by pf. However,
> they're dropped on the machine which is NOT currently master!
>
> That is, I have machines:
>
> 1)
> carp1: flags=49<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> metric 0 mtu 1500
> inet 10.0.80.74 netmask 0xffffff00
> carp: MASTER vhid 2 advbase 1 advskew 0
> carp3: flags=49<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> metric 0 mtu 1500
> inet 10.0.82.74 netmask 0xffffff00
> carp: MASTER vhid 4 advbase 1 advskew 0
>
> 2)
> carp0: flags=49<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> metric 0 mtu 1500
> inet 212.61.136.74 netmask 0xfffffff0
> carp: BACKUP vhid 1 advbase 1 advskew 50
> carp2: flags=49<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> metric 0 mtu 1500
> inet 10.0.81.74 netmask 0xffffff00
> carp: BACKUP vhid 3 advbase 1 advskew 50
>
> 3)
> carp1: flags=49<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> metric 0 mtu 1500
> inet 10.0.80.74 netmask 0xffffff00
> carp: BACKUP vhid 2 advbase 1 advskew 100
> carp3: flags=49<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> metric 0 mtu 1500
> inet 10.0.82.74 netmask 0xffffff00
> carp: BACKUP vhid 4 advbase 1 advskew 100
>
>
> Then from the 10.0.80 network I do a ssh to the 10.0.82 network. The
> router for the 10.0.82 network is 10.0.82.74 and the router for the
> 10.0.80 network is 10.0.80.74 (the VIPs):
>
> > ssh 10.0.82.5
> sebster at 10.0.82.5's password:
> > Read from remote host 10.0.82.5: Connection reset by peer
> Connection to 10.0.82.5 closed.
>
> And then I get on the backup gateways pf log:
>
> machine 2:
> # tcpdump -nttteli pflog0 not src or dst port 6155 and not src or dst
> host 224.0.0.18 and not src or dst port 68
> tcpdump: WARNING: pflog0: no IPv4 address assigned
> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
> listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG (OpenBSD pflog file), capture size
> 96 bytes
> 000000 rule 11/0(match): block in on em1: 10.0.80.3.58876 >
> 10.0.82.5.22: [|tcp]
> 001161 rule 11/0(match): block in on em1: 10.0.80.3.58876 >
> 10.0.82.5.22: [|tcp]
> 000018 rule 11/0(match): block in on em1: 10.0.80.3.58876 >
> 10.0.82.5.22: tcp 20 [bad hdr length 0 - too short, < 20]
>
> machine 3:
> # tcpdump -nttteli pflog0 not src or dst port 6155 and not src or dst
> host 224.0.0.18 and not src or dst port 68
> tcpdump: WARNING: pflog0: no IPv4 address assigned
> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
> listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG (OpenBSD pflog file), capture size
> 96 bytes
> 000000 rule 11/0(match): block in on em1: 10.0.80.3.58876 >
> 10.0.82.5.22: [|tcp]
> 001113 rule 11/0(match): block in on em1: 10.0.80.3.58876 >
> 10.0.82.5.22: [|tcp]
> 000019 rule 11/0(match): block in on em1: 10.0.80.3.58876 >
> 10.0.82.5.22: tcp 20 [bad hdr length 0 - too short, < 20]
>
> I'm wondering why these backup hosts are blocking these packets, even
> though the master is still up, and why they are causing the connection
> to fail. (The pf on all 3 hosts do a "block return log on devif all"
> where devif is the interface with the real 10.0.80.x ip; however, why is
> it returning a RST packet when it's backup?).
>
> I think once I have pfsync the problem will go away due to the
> synchronized state (the backups won't block anymore), but it still seems
> strange to me that all 3 machines will then be actively filtering the
> packets...
>
> Does anybody know what's going on?
>
I'd suggest to look first why all of them're receiving this traffic. It
looks like something is not right in the network itself.
--
Stanislav Sedov
ST4096-RIPE
!DSPAM:49ed85cd967001477745436!
More information about the freebsd-cluster
mailing list