bin/56325: Incorrect information in /etc/gettytab
Bruce Evans
bde at zeta.org.au
Mon Sep 8 10:20:15 PDT 2003
The following reply was made to PR bin/56325; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Bruce Evans <bde at zeta.org.au>
To: Yar Tikhiy <yar at comp.chem.msu.su>
Cc: mats at snowbee.dyns.cx, FreeBSD-gnats-submit at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/56325: Incorrect information in /etc/gettytab
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 03:14:29 +1000 (EST)
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 08:04:01PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > I looked at what the various combinations of parity did when I wrote
> > thos lines in gettytab. I haven't looked at them recently (i never
> > use anything except np). Perhaps changing getty to termios canonicalized
> > the parity support.
>
> Indeed, it was rev. 1.6 of subr.c that introduced the new behaviour
> of the parity flags along with using termios instead of the old BSD
> interface to terminals.
>
> I believe that people use just np nowadays, so the question is
> whether the old behaviour of parity flag combinations is worth
> restoring. How do you think?
Not having it is OK with me. I used just np back when I wrote those
lines in gettytab :-).
Bruce
More information about the freebsd-bugs
mailing list